Newsletter 292: Future Flash 005: The Thought Token Protocol

What You'll Learn Today

In this fifth article of our 12-part Future Flash series:

• Why the The text is already correct. If you intended to provide more context or content, please do of an original idea needs protection in an AI-powered world

• How the Thought Token Protocol tracks and values human contributions to AI workflows

• Real examples of original thinking getting lost or misattributed in AI collaboration

• Why this is especially crucial for neurodivergent minds that think differently

• How thought tracking works without stifling creativity or collaboration

• The connection between your Cognitive File, agent teams, and intellectual contribution

Reading Time: 10-12 minutes | Listening Time: 8-10 minutes if read aloud**

The Morning Coffee Epiphany

Friday morning, like this one. Coffee cooling on my desk. The Northern California fog rolling in through the window, that familiar summer coolness that reminds me of childhood mornings when ideas seemed to come easier.

I was working with my agent team on a concept for helping dyslexic entrepreneurs. Nothing groundbreaking, just a framework for thinking about business challenges through a neurodivergent lens.

Twenty minutes later, I had a complete strategy document. Well-researched, beautifully organized, ready to implement. The agents had taken my scattered thoughts and built something remarkable.

But sitting there in the fog, a question nagged at me: What part of this was actually mine?

I'd provided the initial spark - the insight that dyslexic minds approach business problems differently than neurotypical thinking patterns assume. That observation came from years of living with dyslexia, building companies, watching other neurodivergent entrepreneurs struggle with conventional business advice.

But the agents had researched supporting evidence, structured the framework, filled in implementation details, even suggested marketing approaches. They'd built on my foundation, but they'd built most of the house.

In a world where AI agents extend our thinking, how do we track what belongs to whom? How do we value the original human spark that sets everything in motion?

The Attribution Problem We're Ignoring

We're moving into a world where most intellectual work will be human-AI collaboration. But we're building this future without solving a fundamental question: What happens to human originality?

Right now, when AI helps you write something, the assumption is that you get full credit. After all, you prompted it, you guided it, you decided what to keep.

But what happens when AI agents are doing most of the development work? When your role shifts from creator to conductor, from writer to director?

The current system treats AI contribution as invisible. Like using a really advanced word processor. But that metaphor breaks down when AI agents are making creative decisions, drawing connections, even suggesting directions you hadn't considered.

We need a system that recognizes both human originality and AI contribution. Not to diminish either, but to be honest about what's actually happening.

What the Thought Token Protocol Actually Does

The Thought Token Protocol is a way to track and attribute original human thinking in AI-powered workflows.

Think of it like metadata for ideas. Every time you contribute an original insight, creative direction, or unique perspective to an AI collaboration, that contribution gets tagged with a thought token.

Not the words AI generates. Not the research it finds. But the spark that started everything. The angle that made it interesting. The insight that made it yours.

These tokens follow your ideas through whatever gets built on them. If your observation about dyslexic entrepreneurship becomes the foundation for a course, a book, or a business framework, your original contribution stays connected to whatever emerges.

It's not about ownership in the traditional sense. It's about recognition. About preserving the trail between human insight and what gets built from it.

Sarah's Lost Framework

My friend Sarah learned this the hard way last month.

She'd been working with AI agents to develop a marketing framework specifically for neurodivergent business owners. The core insight was hers - that traditional marketing assumes neurotypical attention patterns and decision-making processes.

She spent weeks collaborating with AI to flesh out the framework, test it with clients, refine the approach. The agents helped with research, structure, implementation details, case studies.

Three weeks later, she saw essentially the same framework presented at a marketing conference by someone else. Same core insight about neurodivergent marketing. Same basic structure. Different examples, but built on the same foundation.

Had they independently arrived at the same idea? Had they used similar AI tools that accessed similar information? Was her original insight floating around in training data somewhere?

She had no way to prove her contribution. No trail showing that her neurodivergent perspective had sparked the framework in the first place.

This is what happens when we don't track human originality in AI collaboration. The spark gets separated from what it ignites.

Why This Matters More for Different Minds

Neurodivergent thinkers often approach problems from angles that others miss. We see patterns, make connections, notice problems that neurotypical thinking overlooks.

These insights are often the most valuable part of what we contribute. But they're also the hardest to protect because they don't look like traditional intellectual property.

My insight about dyslexic entrepreneurship wasn't a formula or a method. It was a way of seeing. A recognition that conventional business advice assumes brain patterns that don't match how many of us actually think.

That perspective, applied through AI collaboration, could generate courses, frameworks, tools, entire businesses. But without thought tracking, the original insight - the thing that made it all possible - becomes invisible.

This matters because neurodivergent insights often get overlooked or dismissed until they prove valuable. By then, the connection to their origin has been lost.

How Thought Tracking Actually Works

The system I envision works like this:

When you're collaborating with AI agents, certain types of contributions get automatically tagged as original human thinking. Novel observations. Creative directions. Unique perspectives based on lived experience. Innovative connections between existing ideas.

Not everything you say. Not every prompt or feedback. But the moments when you contribute something that couldn't have come from training data or conventional analysis.

Your Cognitive File helps identify these moments. It knows how you think, what perspectives you bring, what kinds of insights are characteristic of your mind. When you contribute something that matches your cognitive patterns and represents original thinking, it gets tokenized.

These tokens follow your ideas through whatever gets built on them. If your insight about dyslexic marketing becomes the foundation for someone else's course, the token shows that connection. If your observation about ADHD productivity patterns influences a new app design, your original contribution is preserved in the chain.

The Technology Behind Thought Tokens

This isn't science fiction. The technology already exists to identify original vs. derivative thinking in text and conversation.

AI can analyze whether an idea appears in existing training data or represents novel synthesis. It can identify when someone is drawing on personal experience vs. recombining existing information. It can recognize the linguistic patterns that indicate original insight vs. conventional thinking.

Natural language processing can detect the markers of creative leaps, novel connections, personal perspective. The same technology that powers AI creativity can identify human creativity.

The challenge isn't technical. It's designing systems that protect originality without stifling collaboration.

The Coffee Shop Test

I've been testing this concept informally for weeks now.

Every morning, over coffee, I spend ten minutes identifying what I contributed to yesterday's AI collaborations that couldn't have come from anywhere else. The insights that emerged from my lived experience. The connections I made that reflected my particular way of seeing problems.

Not the research AI found. Not the structures it created. But the sparks that made the collaboration interesting. The human elements that gave direction to the computational power.

Some days it's a lot. Some days it's very little. But tracking it has made me more aware of what I actually bring to human-AI collaboration vs. what the agents contribute.

It's also made me more intentional about contributing genuine insight rather than just managing AI output.

Beyond Attribution

The Thought Token Protocol isn't just about getting credit. It's about understanding what human thinking adds to AI collaboration.

When you can track original human contributions across multiple projects, patterns emerge. You start to see what kinds of insights lead to the most valuable outcomes. What types of human thinking are most generative when combined with AI capabilities.

For neurodivergent minds especially, this visibility matters. It shows that different ways of thinking contribute different kinds of value. That diversity of thought isn't just nice to have - it's measurably valuable in AI collaboration.

The Economics of Original Thinking

Eventually, thought tokens might become more than attribution. They might become a form of value exchange.

If your original insights consistently lead to valuable outcomes when developed through AI collaboration, that pattern has economic significance. The spark that ignites innovation deserves recognition in whatever value gets created.

This could work like royalties for cognition. Not massive payments, but acknowledgment that original human thinking has value in an AI-powered economy.

For neurodivergent thinkers who've often struggled to get fair recognition for their contributions, this represents a fundamental shift. Different thinking becomes visibly valuable rather than just tolerated.

Building Thought-Aware Agent Teams

Your agent teams from Part 4 can be trained to recognize and track your original contributions automatically.

They know your Cognitive File. They understand your thinking patterns, your areas of expertise, your unique perspectives. They can identify when you're contributing something that represents original insight vs. when you're responding to their suggestions.

This happens naturally in the background of your collaborations. You're not stopping to tag your thoughts. The system recognizes originality based on how well it knows your mind.

The result is collaboration that preserves human creativity while amplifying it through AI capabilities.

The Bigger Vision

The Thought Token Protocol is part of something larger. A system where human and artificial intelligence collaborate transparently, with clear attribution for different types of contributions.

This isn't about humans vs. machines. It's about building AI collaboration that enhances human creativity rather than obscuring it. That values original thinking rather than just computational power.

For minds that think differently, this could represent the first time technology truly recognizes and rewards cognitive diversity. Not despite our differences, but because of them.

Starting Today

You don't need to wait for perfect systems to start tracking your original contributions to AI collaboration.

Keep a simple log. What insights did you bring to today's AI interactions that couldn't have come from training data? What perspectives emerged from your lived experience? What connections did you make that reflected your unique way of seeing problems?

Not everything. Just the sparks. The moments when your humanity shaped what AI built.

Over time, you'll develop a clearer sense of what you actually contribute to human-AI collaboration. And that understanding will make your future collaborations more intentionally creative.

Keep Thinking Different

Your original insights are the seeds of everything interesting that gets built in human-AI collaboration.

Protect them. Track them. Value them.

In a world of infinite information, original human thinking becomes the scarcest and most valuable resource.

— Matt Ivey, Founder · LM Lab AI

Part 5 of 12 in the "Predicting the Future with Neurodivergent Logic" Series

Connect with us:

• Newsletter: [Subscribe for the full 12-part journey]

• Thought Tracking: [Share your original contribution discoveries]

• Research: [Read our findings on human originality in AI collaboration]

• Community: [Join conversations about intellectual attribution]

• Predictions Archive: [See all our "We called it first" moments]

TL;DR - Too Long; Didn't Read

For Fellow Skimmers: The Key Points

🔗 The Problem: In AI collaboration, original human insights get separated from what gets built on them, especially hurting neurodivergent contributors who think differently.

💡 The Solution: Thought Token Protocol tracks and attributes original human thinking in AI workflows, like metadata for ideas that follows them through development.

🧠 Why It Matters: Different minds contribute different kinds of original insights that deserve recognition and protection in an AI-powered economy.

🌊 How It Works: Your Cognitive File helps agents recognize your original contributions automatically, preserving the connection between human insight and AI development.

Next: Part 6 - The Agent Relay: How humans and agents pass creative work back and forth in natural collaboration patterns